PRINCIPIA · THEOREM

Complements of the same angle are equal

Dependencies: Protractor axiom (angles can be treated as real numbers).

Statement

Let α\alpha and β\beta both be complementary to the same angle γ\gamma:

α+γ=90,β+γ=90.\alpha + \gamma = 90^{\circ},\qquad \beta + \gamma = 90^{\circ}.

Then α=β\alpha = \beta.

Two right angles are split into \alpha + \gamma and \beta + \gamma, sharing the same \gamma ⇒ \alpha = \beta

Proof

Step 1: translate the figure into two equations. The right angle on the left is split into α\alpha and γ\gamma; the right angle on the right is split into β\beta and the same γ\gamma. The two γ\gamma's are the same angle — that is precisely the "same angle" hypothesis of the theorem.

The two right angles split into (\alpha\,|\,\gamma) and (\beta\,|\,\gamma), sharing \gamma

Step 2: subtract the two equations; the γ\gamma terms cancel. Protractor axiom turns each angle into a real number, so this is just ordinary arithmetic with reals. Subtracting the two equations cancels γ\gamma:

(α+γ)(β+γ)=9090=0,(\alpha + \gamma) - (\beta + \gamma) = 90^{\circ} - 90^{\circ} = 0,

i.e. αβ=0\alpha - \beta = 0, hence α=β\alpha = \beta. \blacksquare

Removing \gamma from each of the two right angles ⇒ the leftover \alpha and \beta must be equal

Immediate consequences

  • Substitutability of co-complements: in any figure containing α+γ=90\alpha + \gamma = 90^{\circ}, as long as you also verify β+γ=90\beta + \gamma = 90^{\circ} you may swap α\alpha for β\beta without changing any other angle relations. This is the cleanest version of the kind of substitution used later in right triangles (the two acute angles are complementary \Rightarrow acute angles are equal).
  • Supplements of the same angle are equal (the 180180^{\circ} version) has a parallel proof: replace 9090^{\circ} by 180180^{\circ} and "complementary" by "supplementary"; the argument is word-for-word the same.

Remarks

The entire content of this theorem lives inside Protractor axiom: once an angle can be assigned a real number, the equality of complements is just one subtraction step in a simple linear system. The geometry is reduced to "admit that angles are real numbers"; everything else is algebra.

Help me make this theorem better